Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Say Amen Somebody!


Well damn! Just as we come to the end of the year, to the HOLY DAZE SEASON we get good news in the battle against teaching religion as science.

A report from Associated Press this morning tells of the ruling against "Intelligent Design" in the Dover Pennsylvania School District. What's even better, is that the case addresses the issue on exactly where it should be addressed. It is unconstitutional to teach religious doctrine in public schoools as if it were fact. What's more significiant is to remember that those religious folk advocating the teaching of religious "values" were themselves lying about their positions, their curriculum and their motives. The judge in the case, John E. Jones III, made this point beautifully when he commented, "It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy."

This is the crux of the whole thing. I have no complaint with what anyone wants to believe. Lord knows, I believe some bizarre things myself, and frankly I largely subscribe to a foundational belief I learned in seminary, from pastoral care professor J. Lynn Elder, who was adamant that, "Whatever you can say about God, that God is not." In other words, whatever our small minds conceive about the world, the God, or the Universe, it is by definition going to be too small to fit the granidosity of what actually exists out there. So go ahead... believe whatever the hell you want, because the universal and probably immutable law is...

EVERYTHING THING YOU KNOW IS WRONG.

In America you can believe... you can even SAY... pretty much anything you want. That's what we're here for.

But you can't teach it to impressionable young minds in schools with state enforced attendance. It isn't fair, it isn't right, it isn't "christian", and most importantly (thank you Judge Jones) it isn't CONSTITUTIONAL!

Score two points for the good guys!

When you add the latest speculation that a Democratic Congress after the 06 elections (we can hope can't we?) could lead to Articles of Impeachment against Dubya, well the LIGHT really is returning folks!

Saturday, October 15, 2005

Burkha Dolls for American Girls

I've been waiting for a really good story to grab me before getting around to writing another of my rants about The American Taliban, and this morning The Huffington Post finally provided the link I needed.

This week's leader of American Taliban is Donald E Wildmon, chairman of the Tupelo, Mississippi based American Family Association which boasts a membership that is 2,213,284 pinheads strong and claims to be "America's Pro-Family Action Web Site." Evidently what Donald Wildmon thinks is pro-family is threatened by the organization Girls, Inc. which has partnered with American Girl to sell some more of those ubiquitous wristsbands, this time with 70 cents of each purchase going to support the programs of Girls, Inc.

Girls Incorporated started out in 1864 and is probably best known as Girl's Clubs (back when Boy's and Girl's Clubs were separate entities). Their website has a Girls' Bill of Rights that I suppose makes Wildmon and his group apoplectic with the idea that girls might actually learn how to grow up to be strong, independent and self-fulfilled women. Wildmon's group insists that Girls, Inc. "promotes abortion and lesbianism" which, it would seem, are two of the devil's darkest, strongest and most egregious tactics. Wending one's way through this idiotic use of bandwidth it becomes rather obvious why the uber-conservatives are having a problem with Harriet Miers (MY problem with Harriet Miers is for another post). An unmarried woman who has made it 60 years on her own without the help of a husband is clearly a threat to the paternalistic, misogynist Wildmon with his deep fears of the devil's powerful ways. If these guys could make it happen, the little girls at Girls Incorporated would be covered head to toe in muslin and never leave the doors of their fathers' homes until they were carted off to be married in a ceremony officiated by Wildmon himself.

The AFA website even offers a comic version of the New Testament for youth who, having been home schooled with the AFA's resources, are evidently incapable of reading a bible with actual WORDS in it, or possessing the critical thinking abilities to allow them to come to their own conclusions about what those words might actually mean for people in 2005. The AFA website also has articles and links to such relevant contemporary issues as a Constitutional Amendment to ban courts from ruling on The Pledge of Allegiance, a Tenessee Republican legislator taking on his state's Black Caucus for racism, a link to a petition against gay marriage, and a diatribe against Target stores for selling sex merchandise by Elexa.Evidently, for Wildmon its important that sex be for procreation only and that nobody have any fun in the process. Wildmon and his idiotic minions seem to have missed one rather significant segment of the Bible they are so sure they believe in; a section that is much closer to the poetry of modern lovers than it is the dried up, joyless and ugly diatribes from these puritanical grumps.

I haven't fully investigated Wildmon's home schooling curriculum, but I'm making a wide ranging guess that it doesn't include Freud's views on human sexual behavior and I imagine Alfred Kinsey is considered a sort of perverse sexual antichrist.

I want to say that numb nuts religious zealots like this should simply be ignored, but I'm afraid that ignoring them will not make them go away. Instead, we need to listen to the words of Tupelo's favorite son and get to work. Those who believe that United States of America really DOES stand for freedom - ALL FREEDOM - and that such a belief is not just a slogan - or a dumb ass lyric in an insipid country song - need to get up off our butts and say so. We need to make our voices heard on the same issues that these dimwits spout off about, we need to donate to organizations like Girls Inc., we need to celebrate goodness, lightness, connection, and yes damnit... even (or perhaps especially) sex.

Beyond all that... we need to make it clear that there are MORE of us than there are of them and that the last time anyone checked, the majority was at least supposed to rule in this country, even if it doesn't always work out that way.

Monday, September 26, 2005

Won't Wash Us Away

Randy Newman's classic tune, "Louisiana 1927," is a song which, following Katrina's slam dunk of New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, became a sort of theme song for the disaster and the Bush administration's magnificently incompetent response. It begins with the stellar line, "What has happened down here is the wind have changed." That may be the clearest statement of the overall realization that we, as a nation, have come to in the four weeks since Katrina slammed my home town and washed our national sleepwalk over the levees and off into the Gulf of Mexico.

I was one of the ones that Sunday evening who, like another of the lines in Newman's song, "got away alright." That night (four weeks ago as I write this, but a seeming eternity inside my head) I sat in the driver's seat of an old beat up Ford van, a sort of fortunate gift from my absentee landlord that allowed me (and my landlord's little dog) to flee the hurricane and make it to the relative safety of my former sweetheart's house in Hattiesburg. Despite our less than stunning end to a 17 year relationship, Marsha welcomed me into her home and even befriended my disheveled companion. Together we spent Monday watching trees fall for eight hours. When it was all over, there was no power, but the little bit of news I could pick up on the radio proclaimed that "New Orleans dodged a bullet." I went to bed that night, thankful for the relative safety I had found and with the glad feeling that after putting in some heavy lifting to help my Mississippi benefactors dig out from under the pile of pine wood that surrounded the house I would be back on the road home, a little tired, a little sweaty, but mostly no worse for wear.

That was before the flood. Before the retaining wall two blocks from my friend's house gave way and buried the house she has lived in for the last seven years under a sea of water. Before "da lower nint" turned into an extension of the Mississippi River and took houses, cars, pets and people with it. Before the police in Gretna turned on their cousins from the Crescent City and sent them across the bridge back to face devastation, disease, and maybe even death. Before the mayor of New Orleans got on the radio and said what we all wanted to say when he told the president and his associates to "get off your asses!" Before Barbara Bush stood in the Houston Astrodome and proclaimed that, "this is actually working out pretty well for these folks." Before the ubiquitous Crescent City greeting, "Where Y'at?" morphed from a question about one's relative health and demeanor and into a serious question about a displaced friend's whereabouts, safety, health and personal circumstances.

That was before I was told that I better get a tetanus shot before I go back home.

Most significantly, it was before Bush swaggered out from behind Andrew Jackson's statue and into the glare of the TV lights to "take responsibility" for "the problems" and to promise 200 billion dollars of money that is not his to give, to bring the city back.

Which of course begs the question… Back to what?

A week after George's moment in the lights of New Orleans (which were turned off again almost immediately after this latest in the long series of staged moments that characterize Bush's ever so theatrical presidency) I returned to my former home in ostensibly liberal Northern California and was greeted by people who were actually discussing the value of plowing the city under and starting over with a sort of instant Disneyland version of The Big Easy; a city that might be just a little higher, a little cleaner, and populated by a whole lot fewer poor people.

In the aforementioned song, Randy Newman repeatedly offers the line, "They're tryin' to wash us away," as an explanation of the inaction, ineptitude, and devastation that resulted in and with the flood of 1927. It is a sentiment that serves as the perfect metaphor for the present circumstances and the present state of the political mind. What was different about the week following Katrina was the simple fact that for 7 days the national self-image, normally defined by the carefully scrubbed images of happy people in sitcoms and talk shows was sent into a state of toxic shock. As if some evil interloper had collectively poisoned all the drinking water, our televisions, newspapers and computers spilled over like the waters of Lake Pontchartrain and flooded our homes with the deep, frightening hallucinations of people living and dying without all the things that we like to believe our nation stands for. Without water, food, medicine, safety, help, attention, hope, or love.

It is these images, and not their underlying reality, that seems to now be the target of "relief efforts." After ignoring the problem for nearly a week, the Bush administration finally figured out that they better do some damage control, so the military finally made it in, people were finally pulled out and the streets were made safe, dry, and clean with astonishing rapidity. Within days we were treated to the official announcement that New Orleans was "… now among the safest cities in the nation." Of course, the only people left were soldiers with M16s, but why quibble with such impressive crime statistics? Katrina had succeeded in accomplishing something that countless administrations had been unable to achieve, she had cleaned up crime in New Orleans. If the city was now a toxic wasteland unfit for human habitation, well, tough problems demand tough solutions.

It is this mindset that seems to characterize all the efforts at some sort of cultural clarity in America today. The broad differences and exciting quirks that make our national culture as unique as it is seem to be the prime target of efforts to turn us into some sort of Calvinistic, money producing, oil consuming, cultural machine. From this point of view, it's not for nothing that the people who suffered the most were simply the people who didn't own cars. In the New America it's important to have a car, to have a job and to have a solid handle on the cultural expectations of the primary demographic.

The problem is, as Randy sings, "the wind have changed." The nightmare of Katrina has finally demonstrated to the country that the little boy emperor really has no clothes and we aren't going to cheer the parade. New Orleans (like San Francisco, that other precariously positioned coastal city), does not easily fit into the mold. As a people, New Orleanians will not fit into the mold. In general, we are a damned stubborn and rather ribald bunch of folks. We're mostly like that old joke about how you can "dress him up but ya can't take him out." We are inevitably going to pop out of our monkey suits, laugh too loudly, drink too much and spill things on our dinner jackets. We're very likely to dress up in stupid costumes, throw worthless beads (but only at clearly specified times), play loud music and celebrate when we should be working. We know how to party, and we aren't really good at being puritanical, judgmental and intolerant. You can come to our richly cultured city and spend your entire vacation drinking on Bourbon Street and return home thinking that you experienced New Orleans, while we have gone on being the lively, vibrant, mixed up human gumbo this little delta town has always been and you will have missed all the best parties. We won't judge you for that. In New Orleans people are mostly allowed to be who (and what) they are. As things come back together, you're welcome to come and join the party (for there will most definitely be a party), and you can pull out a cleaning rag and put a new shine on our city. We might even like it. But it's best to understand that we will always be who we are and we are highly unlikely to fit the mold that others have set for us. The rest of the country might want to take note.

You can clean us up, but you won't wash us away.

Friday, September 09, 2005

Three Thousand Words

It's been said that a picture is worth a thousand words.
It's also been said that ACTIONS speak louder than words...


There will come a time, and that time is coming soon, when I will have the words to write in a way that will express my feelings of sadness, frustration, anger and outrage about what occured last week in my lovely city.

But right now I, quite uncharacteristically, don't have the words. So I am going to allow these pictures, sent to me by friends, to speak instead.

For your edification... 3,000 words on George Dubya Bush


Okay... it's actually 3,014 words.

Monday, August 22, 2005

Stop Me Before I Have Another Facelift!

The World's Stupidest Man

We already know that Pat Robertson doesn't have any Juevos. He proved that four years ago after 9/11, when he shared the TV screen with Jerry Falwell - another mental midget - who proclaimed that God was attacking our country, "because of the gays, and the lesbians and the abortionists, and the ACLU..." Robertson sat there nodding and grinning like some leatherette Walmart knockoff of Charlie McCarthy. Later, when he briefly came to his senses, Falwell actually apologized for the remark, yet Robertson spent the time backing and filling and trying to claim that he never said anything.

Now the man is facing into his battery of TV cameras on what they have the audacity to call the "Christian" Broadcasting Network, speaking to his multi-million person audience of true believers and directly calling for the assasination of the duly elected leader of a sovereign nation! Why? He says why! Because he's "sitting on a big pool of oil." Robertson wants someone to assasinate Chavez, not because he has attacked the U.S. Not because he has advocated attacking the U.S. Not because he lives in a country that will likely become "a launching pad for... Muslim extremism," as he puts it. In Venezuela, 92% of the population are baptised Catholics!

He wants him whacked for oil!

I'm sure that if Pat were questioned on the matter he would be incapable of seeing the similarity between this "Fatwa" issued by a Christian (rather than Islamic) fundamentalist wacko (namely himself) and Fatwas issued by various Islamic (rather than Christian) fundamentalist wackos regarding the murder of everyone from Salman Rushdie to George Bush, or any other set of "unworthy" people. Not only is he a hypocrite an idiot and a coward, but it seems to me that the man has gone completely insane! Assasination is not simply a cheaper method of reducing the price of gasoline, it is international aggression, it is murder, it is ANTI-Christian, and, even though we have clearly been known to use it as a method, it is UN-American.

Robertson, Falwell , Dobson and their millions of followers have become, as Cenk Uyger calls them, the American Taliban. They are no more Christian than the Taliban are Muslim. Neither of these groups represents the "better... natures" of their chosen religious models. They are a menace to true spirituality and they are a menace to American society. We can't kill them, and frankly we can't even shut them up. But we don't have to listen to them, we don't have to give them the time of day, and we CAN send them into exile where they belong.

As best I can figure from the evidence in the picture above, Robertson has simply had so many facelifts that his brain has been sucked out the back of his head and the only remaining goal for his life is to see if he can transform his face into a mirror image of that other marvelously cosmeticized fundamentalist wacko, Tammy Faye!



Now the only thing is, I may have been wrong about Pat up above when I said he had no Juevos. Clearly he has more balls than Bush who can't even bring himself to acknowledge his lies, come clean on the real reason for our war in Iraq and meet with a lowly housewife from Vacaville who is mourning the loss of her son in Bush's War for Oil. Ol' Pat just comes right out and says it.

On the other hand, Bush's main occupation seems to be peddling around the ranch with the one guy allowed into his circle who we actually KNOW has a ball!

It's Good to be King

Bush and Lance went riding around the ranch on Sunday.

On the Huff Post, Bob Cesca projects a little on the conversation.

It makes one wonder what Sheryl's thinking. Too bad Cindy Sheehan had to go to LA to be with her mom. Maybe we could have had a shot of Sheryl and Cindy and Joan, while the boys were peddling the ranch.

The big news is that it looks like Dubya was able to remain upright on the bike this time... Talk about Hard Work!

Thursday, August 18, 2005

Head coming back together... need coffee

In the light of morning, and a reading of a more reasoned perspective on the same NPR website, I am feeling a little bit better about the fact that the people who have made an idiot like Al Mohler the "president" of a formerly legitimate educational institution do not have control of all religious perspective (or even Christian perspective) in U.S. The piece by Dr. Katharyn Jefferts Schori is a well reasoned and well explained example on what is actually possible to believe as a thinking person with christian proclivities in a contemporary society.

Another of the accompanying articles, this one by Rabbi Brad Hirschfield does a marvelous job of explaining the possibility of holding more than one position simultaneously. Rabbi Hirschfield even addresses the issue of why the debate raises so many hackles on both side (mine for instance). His statement that, "The increasingly nasty debate between believers in Darwinian evolution and advocates for intelligent design theory hinges on the fact that most creationists relate to evolutionists as if they have no soul, and most evolutionists relate to the creationists as if they have no brain," is pretty accurate. He then suggests that a better perspective would be to acknowledge that we all have both.

Well... you're a better man than I am Gunga Din. I'd really like to be that broad minded, but when someone like the good "dr." Mohler abdicates the use of his brain in such a clear manner it is my perspective that, like any muscle consistently ignored, his brain has likely turned to mush.

For another example of the phenomenon all one needs to do is look toward Crawford this week to find a man who may have allowed BOTH his brain and his soul to atrophy. Perhaps we just need to wait for him to fall off his bike... again.

All hope is not quite lost.

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

Exploding head... Watch for shrapnel

NPR has decided that the process of considering all things means giving people who claim to be things that they are not the attention they might deserve if reasonable people accepted their claims of authenticity.

Weighing in on the "debate" about evolution and "intelligent" design is R. Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Seminary in Louisvile, KY a school that in days gone by was considered the "liberal" outpost of Southern Baptist life.

NPR has decided to give "dr." Mohler the opportunity to express an equal time type of opinion on the "evangelical baptist" perspective regarding the issue.

There are so many things wrong with this, before we even get to the question of whether the term"evangelical baptist" is redundant or an oxymoron, that I just want to run naked and screaming down St. Charles Avenue. Actually, it's so bleeding hot that I really wouldn't mind running naked (and screaming) down St. Charles Avenue, so I probably shouldn't go blaming that proclivity on poor "dr." Mohler.

In any case... there will be more forthcoming on this matter, as my recent move back to the south has, for some strange reason, pushed me back into the arms of my old southern baptist tradition, but with a new and absolutely unrelenting perspective on what that all means... and doesn't mean.

Monday, August 15, 2005

The Pomo of Crawford

While George Bush avoids Cindy Sheehan and makes pronouncements about creationist education, Leon Wieseltier of The New Republic offers a fabulous analysis of the issues that are really alive in the "Intelligent Design" absurdity.

Check out his article here. If you aren't already registered with The New Republic you'll have to jump through their little hoops, but it's free and it's worth it.

You might also want to have a look at the Jerry Coyne article on the Harrisburg Pennsylvania school case (where's Clarence Darrow when we need him?) that launched this rickety ship.

Since when did religion become scientific theory in the modern world and when ever did accurate science actually do harm to a true and reasoned faith? These realities don't speak to the same part of the human animal. Something I learned a long time ago in seminary (before the extreme fundamentalists gutted anything that could actually be mistaken for education) was that Science and Faith are NOT mutually exclusive, but you better not try to make them explain the same things. They don't let them teach that any more since the reactionaries took control of the SBC, but that doesn't make it any less true.

Sunday, August 14, 2005

Opening Salvo

So... I've long thought of doing a political pontification blog, but I've never really bothered to broadcast my opinions anywhere except as a blow hard down at the local pub.

The thing is, I come by my political inclinations honestly... I was raised with the understanding that I am as close a relation to George Washington as it is possible to be (a first cousin seven generations removed). After doing some of my own research, I'm not completely sure that claim is totally accurate, but I'll post more on that later. The main point is that I have been given that label (and the attendant charge) all my life. Hell, I even sang Yankee Doodle Dandy on TV when I was 6 years old. I was doomed to showbiz or poilitics from the start, so as a compromise, for a short period of time that has subsequently scarred me for life, I became a Southern Baptist preacher... a little bit showbiz, a little bit politics, a whole lot of God on my side. One of the best things about that "calling" was the fact that with GOD on my side, who could possibly be against me; not the bullies down the block, not the government, not my mother, not anyone. GOD was my ultimate authority and GOD talked to me directly. That fact that this GOD might actually be talking to other people, and that to those other people he might be saying something different than what he was saying to me, was sommething that I never even considered, let alone seriously entertained.

At this point in my life I don't believe I have any special knowledge of God's dealings with humanity, and whatever it is She might be saying, I am fully prepared to accept that the message for me is possibly, even probably different than the message for somebody else. This is one of the things (besides not being president) that makes me different from George W. Bush. When I hear from God these days, I usually notice that God has a tendency to be speaking to me through the mouths of other people. Sometimes that person is a homeless guy on Market Street, sometimes he's the Dean of a grand cathedral. Sometimes its in the words of a song. Sometimes, God speaks to me through the lips (or the email fingertip tappings) of my daughter and sometimes I hear the "still small voice" like Elijah; not in the wind, not in the earthquake, but in the quiet, when I sit down and shut up.

So... in this blog, despite it's clearly political intention, I will endeavor not to speak for God, or anyone else. I'll just try and speak for me.


Dubya says that God told him to strike Iraq.

Sometimes God speaks from strange locations... and usually to "lesser vessels" and maybe the president should be listening to one of them.